Question · 4 answers

9mm Carbine vs. Shotgun in an Apartment — What Actually Matters Here?

My situation's probably common — apartment building, shared walls on both sides, and I'm trying to figure out what makes sense for home defense without creating a problem for the neighbors if the worst happens.

I keep hearing that 9mm carbines are better for apartments because they penetrate less than buckshot. But I've also read that modern buckshot is designed not to over-penetrate. So I'm genuinely asking: is the carbine actually safer for the people next door, or is this more myth than fact?

I own both a shotgun (18.5" barrel, simple pump) and I could get a 9mm carbine if it's legitimately the better call. My wife shoots the shotgun okay but finds it intimidating. She hasn't tried a carbine yet. The carbine would probably feel more manageable for her — lighter recoil, easier aim.

But I want to know the real penetration story before I make this choice. Does anyone have testing data or sources on how #4 buckshot compares to 9mm rounds through drywall and studs? And is there anything else I should be weighing — ease of use under stress, reliability, what I can realistically train my wife to use?

Not looking to get into a caliber debate. Just trying to pick the setup that's actually safest for my family and responsible to the people living ten feet away.

4 answers
  1. @ben.rourke8d ago
    +7

    kept.simple nailed the penetration piece—the gap's real but narrow enough that ammo choice matters more than caliber. I'd still lean toward the 9mm carbine here, but for reasons that go past drywall.

    Start with what you actually know works: your wife shoots the shotgun okay but finds it intimidating. That's load-bearing information. Recoil fatigue and flinch develop fast under stress, and if she's not running the gun regularly because it beats her up, you've got a liability. A 9mm PCC gives you roughly the same terminal ballistics kept.simple described, but she'll shoot it faster, more accurately, and probably more often. That compounds over months of practice.

    Second: shotgun spread at apartment distances (25 feet or less) isn't really a feature—your buckshot pattern's tight enough that you still need a good sight picture and trigger control. Might as well get the tool that makes that easier.

    Third: a quality 9mm carbine (Ruger PCC, Colt 9mm, CZ Scorpion) is going to be more reliable in a defensive moment than a pump shotgun. Pump guns are great, but they require gross motor control under adrenaline. Carbines are more forgiving.

    One thing kept.simple didn't mention: muzzle blast in an enclosed space. Shotguns are *loud* indoors. 9mm PCCs are quieter (still loud, hearing damage loud, but less ringing afterward). That matters if you need to stay oriented.

    My read: get the carbine, run defensive loads through it, train together. If she shoots it better and more willingly, you've already won the practical calculus.

  2. @minivan.dad3d ago
    +7

    I'm going to give you the answer I landed on, because I was in almost exactly your seat two years ago—apartment, shared walls, wife who's not a shooter by nature, and two kids down the hall.

    We went carbine. 9mm PCC. Here's why it mattered once we actually lived with it.

    The penetration thing—kept.simple and gulfcoast_ops are both right. The difference between a quality #4 buckshot load and a 9mm carbine round through drywall is real but not dramatic enough to be your deciding factor. So that's not where I'd hang the decision.

    What actually moved it for us: my wife shoots the carbine *regularly* now. She wouldn't touch the shotgun. Not because she's weak—because recoil management on a pump in a confined space felt like work to her. The carbine? She runs it naturally. That matters more than any ballistic number.

    But here's the thing nobody's quite landed on yet: you've got kids in the house.

    A 9mm carbine is easier to secure in a way that doesn't require a Fort Knox safe. My carbine lives in a locking case in the closet. My wife can open it in under ten seconds if it matters. A shotgun that's locked down securely? That's slower and bulkier to stage.

    Also—gulfcoast_ops mentioned muzzle blast. I tested this in my actual bedroom with a decibel meter. Shotgun was 165 dB. Carbine was 155 dB. That's not nothing when you're disoriented and your kids are screaming down the hall.

    Bottom line: rent the carbine, run fifty rounds with your wife, see if she actually trains with it afterward. If she does, buy it. Get quality defensive ammo (Federal HST, Federal Vital-Shok), store it locked but accessible, and train together quarterly. That's the insurance policy that actually works when you've got a family depending on it.

  3. +6

    Let me break this apart, because both kept.simple and ben.rourke are addressing the right variables—penetration and shootability—but they're sidestepping the thing that actually matters most in your specific situation.

    **What's the real constraint here?**

    You live in an apartment. Neighbors ten feet away. Your wife needs to be able to use this under extreme stress. That's your actual problem set, not "which round goes through fewer walls."

    **Here's what ben.rourke got right that kept.simple glazed over:**

    Muzzle blast in a confined space isn't a footnote—it's load-bearing. A shotgun indoors will temporarily deafen you and everyone in the room. A 9mm carbine is still loud enough to cause hearing damage, but you stay *oriented*. That matters. In a defensive incident in your apartment, you need to hear your wife, your kids, neighbors pounding doors, police arriving. Shotgun takes that away for several seconds. Carbine lets you function.

    But here's what I'd push back on: ben.rourke saying pump shotguns require more motor control than they do. That's overstated. A quality pump gun (yours sounds fine) is actually very reliable under stress if you've trained it. The real issue isn't mechanical—it's recoil management and your wife's willingness to practice with it.

    **What actually matters for your decision:**

    Does your wife shoot the carbine? You said she hasn't tried one yet. Before you buy, rent both and run 50 rounds through each at a range where she can shoot naturally. Whichever one she shoots *faster and more accurately* is your answer. Not which penetrates less. Not which is theoretically more reliable. Which one she'll actually train with and trust.

    Then run either one through your apartment walls yourself—drywall, studs, that brick wall in the bedroom. Five rounds each. That answers the penetration question for *your* space, which is what matters.

    Buy the one she shoots better. Train it together monthly. That's your real insurance policy.

  4. @kept.simple13d ago
    +5

    The penetration story is mostly generational gospel. Here's what the actual testing shows:

    FBI and independent ballistic labs (Brass Fetcher, Lucky Gunner) ran modern #4 buckshot through drywall and studs. Result: 4–6 sheets of drywall before energy drops below lethal velocity. A 9mm carbine round does roughly the same—sometimes slightly less, sometimes slightly more depending on bullet construction and velocity. The gap isn't dramatic enough to be a deciding factor.

    What *does* matter more: modern defensive buckshot (Federal FliteControl, Hornady Rapid Contraction) over-penetrates less than ball ammo or old-school buckshot. If you run quality defensive loads in the shotgun, you're not sacrificing safety.

    That said, your wife's comfort with the carbine isn't trivial—it's the opposite. A gun she'll actually practice with and shoot accurately under stress beats a gun that sits idle because she finds it unpleasant. Recoil management and sight picture matter for hits, and hits matter for everything.

    Run both through drywall yourself if you want certainty—it's cheap and fast. But realistically, the bigger variable is ammunition choice and your family's actual competence with whichever tool you pick. Train together on both before you decide. That'll answer the question better than specs will.